Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2025
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025: entries now open – as well as sponsorship opportunities too!
Celebrating the excellence, resilience, and humanity at the heart of family law.The LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025 are officially open for entries – and with them, a unique opportunity for...
Pregnant children and their best interests
Mary Welstead, Visiting Professor in Family law University Mrs Justice Arbuthnot held that AZ, an 11 year old, lacked Gillick competence to decide the future of her pregnancy. Her parents...
No longer ‘contact at all costs’: a new approach from Cafcass? Implications for private law cases
Tom Doyle, Park Square BarristersMost family lawyers will undoubtedly now be aware of the new domestic abuse practice policy published by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service...
Good practice: creating an accessible system for people with physical limitations: Part 1
Reagan Persaud, Spire BarristersFamily law is an arena for everyone. Every kind of person has the potential to frequent these courts hoping for justice. It is therefore common place for users who have...
‘Do they have to know about that?’ Human rights considerations and disclosure
Simon Johnson, Pump Court ChambersThis article examines the difficult and often emotive issue of disclosure of highly personal information about one party to other parties within public law...
View all articles
Authors

President issues new guidance on McKenzie Friends

Sep 29, 2018, 17:28 PM
Title : President issues new guidance on McKenzie Friends
Slug : president-issues-new-guidance-on-mckenzie-friends
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 12, 2010, 04:45 AM
Article ID : 91165

Family DivisionThe Master of the Rolls and the President of the Family Division have issued new guidance on McKenzie Friends in light of the increase in litigants-in-person in all levels of the civil and family courts.

The guidance is intended to remind courts and litigants of the principles set out in the authorities and supersedes the guidance contained in Practice Note (Family Courts: McKenzie Friends, 14 April 2008).

The guidance sets out what a McKenzie Friend is permitted to do, for instance they may quietly give advice on any aspect of the conduct of the case but they may not address the court, make oral submissions or examine witnesses.

It makes clear the situations in which the court could refuse to permit a litigant receiving the assistance of a McKenzie Friend. Examples of circumstances where this might arise include where the McKenzie Friend "is using the litigant as a puppet", "is directly or indirectly conducting the litigation" or the court is not satisfied that they "fully understand the duty of confidentiality".

Litigants can enter into agreements to pay fees to McKenzie Friends for the provision of administrative assistance in or out of court, the guidance clarifies. However, such fees cannot be recovered from the opposing party.

The guidance also cautions judges not to justify refusing the litigant assistance because a McKenzie Friend "belongs to an organisation that promotes a particular cause".

Families Need Fathers (FNF) broadly welcomes this clarification and the greater recognition of the value of McKenzie Friends to litigants in person. However, they are concerned about paragraph 13 which provides for litigants to be denied the assistance of a McKenzie Friend.

Becky Jarvis, FNF's Policy Officer, said:  "We hope that [paragraph 13] does not limit or restrain the support that a McKenzie Friend can provide in Court which generally supports the efficient administration of Justice.

"We are pleased that remuneration is specified, although we believe that to further support the Litigant in Person, costs need to be recoverable if costs are made against the opposing party.

"This is an important step forward for users of the Court Service, who increasingly rely on McKenzie Friends in these difficult financial times," she added.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles