Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Pension sharing in a needs case – W v H (divorce financial remedies) [2020] EWFC B10

Jul 28, 2020, 15:26 PM
Pension sharing in a needs case (W v H (divorce financial remedies) [2020] EWFC B10). The court gives consideration to the Pension Advisory Group report.
Slug :
Meta Title : Pension sharing in a needs case – W v H (divorce financial remedies) [2020] EWFC B10
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 6, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Sarah Higgins, CRSB Law

Pension sharing in a needs case (W v H (divorce financial remedies) [2020] EWFC B10). The court gives consideration to the Pension Advisory Group report. The judge in this case provides guidance on the following three main issues in a needs case (the majority of financial cases): 1. Should a pension be divided by the capital or income value if the aim is to promote equality? Normally in a needs case the court should look to equality of income as a pension generally is intended to provide income during retirement. 2. Should a premarital portion of a pension be excluded from division? This will often be unfair because the division will often not meet the needs of the party who did not make the premarital contribution. 3. When should a pension be offset? The judgment explores the difficulties in offsetting pensions, both from the point of view of meeting housing needs, and in practice as to what the fair offsetting value would be.


The full article will be published in the July issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from