Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Miller v Miller: The Descent into Chaos

Sep 29, 2018, 16:34 PM
The marriage in Miller v Miller [2005] EWCA Civ 984, [2005] FLR (forthcoming) had lasted just under 3 years and a capital transfer to the wife, worth £5 million, was ordered by the trial judge. John Eekelaar considers several issues arising from the judgments in Miller.
Slug : miller-v-miller-the-descent-into-chaos
Meta Title : Miller v Miller: The Descent into Chaos
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 18, 2005, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85533

John Eekelaar, Fellow of Pembroke College, Oxford. The marriage in Miller v Miller [2005] EWCA Civ 984, [2005] FLR (forthcoming) had lasted just under 3 years and a capital transfer to the wife, worth £5 million, was ordered by the trial judge. John Eekelaar considers several issues arising from the judgments in Miller. The author concludes that the House of Lords needs to take control. Our system may be discretionary but the discretion must be centred on firm principle and policy. These are tolerably clear. Subject to giving first consideration to the welfare of children, awards are made either on the basis of earning a share in assets or on need. The author focuses on the American Law Institute (ALI)s report, Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution" (2002), which in his opinion contains probably the most thorough and systematic examination of the relevant principles in the common law world. The author does not advocate that all of the ALI's principles should be adopted, but suggests that the ALIs report contains useful insights. See November [2005] Fam Law 870 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from