Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2025
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025: entries now open – as well as sponsorship opportunities too!
Celebrating the excellence, resilience, and humanity at the heart of family law.The LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025 are officially open for entries – and with them, a unique opportunity for...
AlphaBiolabs: Bridging the gap – when a hair drug test is not enough
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters.Drug testing plays a crucial role...
‘Do they have to know about that?’ Human rights considerations and disclosure
Simon Johnson, Pump Court ChambersThis article examines the difficult and often emotive issue of disclosure of highly personal information about one party to other parties within public law...
Cases of parental death before protective measures – are affirmation of the Children Act’s adaptability?
Avaia Williams, Parklane PlowdenTwo recent family court decisions explore whether the statutory threshold under the Children Act 1989 can be met when parental harm occurs before a child’s birth or...
Supporting and questioning neurodivergent parties in Family Court proceedings
Frances Harris, Harcourt ChambersHelen Little, Harcourt ChambersReflecting on the recent Family Justice Council guidelines on Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System for Practitioners, this...
View all articles
Authors

Munro Review's Final Report published

Sep 29, 2018, 18:15 PM
Title : Munro Review's Final Report published
Slug : MunroReview10052011-698
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : May 10, 2011, 07:50 AM
Article ID : 94759

Professor MunroThe Final Report of Professor Eileen Munro's of Review of Child Protection, A child-centred system, is published today. Professor Munro's analysis finds that local areas should have more freedom to design their own child protection services and that ‘one-size-fits-all approach' to child protection is preventing local areas from focusing on the needs of the child.

The report signals a radical shift from previous reforms that resulted in too much bureaucracy and a loss of focus on the needs of the child. Professor Munro says that the government and local authorities should operate in an open culture, continually learn from what has happened in the past, trust professionals and give them the best possible training.

Professor Munro's recommendations are aimed at creating long-term change to the system. She recommends a fundamental shift in the way the child protection system works, to enable professionals to focus on the needs of children, young people and families and how to give them the best possible help.

The first report, published in October 2010, analysed why problems had come about in the child protection system and why previous reforms had unforeseen consequences. Her second report, published in February this year, considered the child's journey through the protection system - from needing to receiving help - to show how the system could be improved.

Professor Munro's final report makes 15 recommendations which are designed to change the child protection system from a compliance to a learning culture. Speaking about the culture shift, Professor Munro said: "It will require more determined and robust management at the front line to support the development of professional confidence. Given the considerable interest in the review, and the feedback I have received, I am confident that there are many people working in the sector who are capable and eager to take on this responsibility."

The recommendations include:

  • Revise statutory guidance and modify inspection process to encourage professionals to exercise their judgment on how to provide services to children and families.
  • Reduce targets, IT systems and "artificial set timescales" for professionals.
  • More regular reviews of cases and adoption of the ‘systems approach' to case reviews.
  • Increase focus on preventative services rather than reactive services. Identify children at risk of harm by increasing coordination of services.
  • Improve the training and continuing professional development for social workers.
  • Keep experienced social workers on the frontline and change the social worker career structure to encourage and reward growing expertise.
  • Designate a principal child and family social worker in each local authority to report the views and experiences of the frontline.
  • Creation of a Chief Social Worker for England to advise Ministers on what they can do to assist social workers in improving practice. 

The NSPCC has responded by emphasising that the Munro Report is only the beginning of the process of reform. Chief executive Andrew Flanagan said: "The NSPCC supports Munro's vision of a child protection system centred on the child and free from unnecessary red tape. Social workers have become too focused on filling in forms rather than using their skills and judgement to meet children's needs. But her report is short on detail.

"The government should not move too quickly to rapid deregulation. It needs to invest heavily in building the skills, confidence and experience of all professionals working with children. Controls which safeguard against poor practice must stay in place while professionalism is built. Otherwise, children's lives could be put at risk," Mr Flanagan warned.

The government will work with a group of professionals from across the children's sector to develop a full response to Professor Munro's recommendations later this year.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products