Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles

CHILD SUPPORT: Brough v Law [2011] EWCA Civ 1183

Sep 29, 2018, 19:11 PM
Slug : BroughvLaw2011EWCACiv1183
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 10, 2011, 11:00 AM
Article ID : 97243

(Court of Appeal; Pill, Rimer and Lewison LJJ; 20 October 2011)

In a maintenance assessment the absent father was assessed at a nil liability. Seven years later he was assessed at £94.21 a week. The father applied for cancellation of assessment relying on brief reconciliation (6 weeks) just after the nil liability assessment. The Secretary of State agreed and cancelled the assessment. The mother appealed. The key issue was the meaning and effect of the Child Support Act 1991, Schedule 1, para 16(1)(b).  

Under the Child Support Act 1991 Sch 1, para 16(1)(d) a reconciliation must last for 6 months or more before a maintenance assessment permanently ceased to have effect. Reference in para 16(1)(b) to there no longer being ‘any qualifying child' was not about the particular child no longer ‘qualifying', but about there no longer being a qualifying ‘child', covering, for example, the death of the child, or the child becoming too old to be a child. Any other interpretation made para 16(1)(d) redundant.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from