Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Lockdown 2: how does it affect child contact?
No sooner had clarity been obtained as to how child contact would work within and across the tier system, than the government announced its suspension in England.  From 5 November 2020, a 4-week...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
View all articles
Authors

CHILD SUPPORT: Brough v Law [2011] EWCA Civ 1183

Sep 29, 2018, 19:11 PM
Slug : BroughvLaw2011EWCACiv1183
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 10, 2011, 11:00 AM
Article ID : 97243

(Court of Appeal; Pill, Rimer and Lewison LJJ; 20 October 2011)

In a maintenance assessment the absent father was assessed at a nil liability. Seven years later he was assessed at £94.21 a week. The father applied for cancellation of assessment relying on brief reconciliation (6 weeks) just after the nil liability assessment. The Secretary of State agreed and cancelled the assessment. The mother appealed. The key issue was the meaning and effect of the Child Support Act 1991, Schedule 1, para 16(1)(b).  

Under the Child Support Act 1991 Sch 1, para 16(1)(d) a reconciliation must last for 6 months or more before a maintenance assessment permanently ceased to have effect. Reference in para 16(1)(b) to there no longer being ‘any qualifying child' was not about the particular child no longer ‘qualifying', but about there no longer being a qualifying ‘child', covering, for example, the death of the child, or the child becoming too old to be a child. Any other interpretation made para 16(1)(d) redundant.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from