Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Pension apportionment: resisting the straight-line orthodoxy
Fiona Hay, 2 Harcourt BuildingsDavid Lockett, Senior Actuary, Actuaries for Lawyers LtdPension Apportionment – resisting the Straight-Line Orthodoxy. In non-needs cases it is often critical to...
Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Equality roulette: assessing the legality of the Department of Education’s guidance on gender questioning students in schools (Part 2)
Dr Bianca Jackson, Family law barrister, Coram ChambersThis is Part 2 of a three-part article exploring the possible legal difficulties for schools and colleges that adopt the Department for...
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
View all articles
Authors

Bar Council urges MPs to reject Legal Aid Bill

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Title : Bar Council urges MPs to reject Legal Aid Bill
Slug : BarCouncilLegalAid28062011-354
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jun 28, 2011, 11:20 AM
Article ID : 95099

Bar CouncilThe Bar Council has written to MPs to voice serious concerns about the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, which is scheduled for its second reading in the House of Commons tomorrow afternoon.

Presented to Parliament last Tuesday, the Bill proposes to cut funding to family legal aid services in all areas with the exception of orders or procedures for the care, supervision or protection of children.

The Government has ignored thousands of responses to its consultation in which only 3% of the respondents supported proposals to remove large numbers of cases from the scope of legal aid.

In the briefing to MPs, the Bar Council has argued that abolishing legal aid for legal advice and representation in private law family cases will lead to people having to go to court by themselves. The result would be litigants in person prolonging the length of cases in which they might not put their best arguments before the judiciary. The Bar's concerns have been echoed by the Judges' Council of England and Wales.

The Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, said: "The bill proposals will cause great harm to ordinary people. We continue to make the case for access to justice in the strongest terms. There has been much public debate about sentencing. There must be a similar scrutiny of these wide-ranging proposed changes to legal aid.

"A cut-price, DIY justice system, which will actually end up costing more money, rather than saving it, is in no one's interests."

 

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from