Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2025
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025: entries now open – as well as sponsorship opportunities too!
Celebrating the excellence, resilience, and humanity at the heart of family law.The LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025 are officially open for entries – and with them, a unique opportunity for...
Pregnant children and their best interests
Mary Welstead, Visiting Professor in Family law University Mrs Justice Arbuthnot held that AZ, an 11 year old, lacked Gillick competence to decide the future of her pregnancy. Her parents...
No longer ‘contact at all costs’: a new approach from Cafcass? Implications for private law cases
Tom Doyle, Park Square BarristersMost family lawyers will undoubtedly now be aware of the new domestic abuse practice policy published by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service...
Good practice: creating an accessible system for people with physical limitations: Part 1
Reagan Persaud, Spire BarristersFamily law is an arena for everyone. Every kind of person has the potential to frequent these courts hoping for justice. It is therefore common place for users who have...
‘Do they have to know about that?’ Human rights considerations and disclosure
Simon Johnson, Pump Court ChambersThis article examines the difficult and often emotive issue of disclosure of highly personal information about one party to other parties within public law...
View all articles
Authors

David Cameron criticised for comments on absent fathers

Sep 29, 2018, 18:24 PM
Title : David Cameron criticised for comments on absent fathers
Slug : AbsentFathers20062011-324
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jun 20, 2011, 05:40 AM
Article ID : 95051

Father and daughterDavid Cameron's comments in the Sunday Telegraph that "runaway dads" should be stigmatised in the same way as drink-drivers, has been criticised by single parent charities who say he should focus instead on addressing the barriers which prevent the involvement of fathers.

The charities are concerned that his comments risk casting all separated fathers as irresponsible, when many wish to see their children but are prevented from doing so.

Ken Sanderson, CEO of Families Need Fathers, said, "Mr Cameron appears to have overlooked the complexity of separated families. Very few fathers choose deliberately to walk away from their children, and it is damaging in the extreme to suggest that this is the common experience. Rather than simply wringing his hands about the ‘bogeyman' of the absent father, Mr Cameron would be well advised to examine how his government can ensure that the importance of fatherhood is better reflected in law, rather than simply in rhetoric."

Mr Sanderson continued, "Mr Cameron gives the impression in his article that he does not believe the government can do anything to ensure that fathers are involved in children's lives following separation. If he genuinely wishes for fathers to be more involved in children's lives, he needs to ensure that the law reflects the importance and status of fathers in families. There is plenty that Mr Cameron could do in this regard. This could include requiring both parents to sign their child's birth certificate, or ensuring that local services such as schools and doctors treat both parents equally and provide them with the same information on their children, regardless of which parent lives with the child."

Single parent charities point out that while David Cameron criticises absent fathers, the government is due to increase fees for single parents who make child maintenance payments. From 2012 single parents who want to use the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission will have to pay an upfront application fee of up to £100 plus an extra ongoing charge of between 7% and 12% of the money paid for children where payments are collected and enforced by CMEC.

Gingerbread chief executive Fiona Weir said: "David Cameron is right that single mums - and indeed single dads - do a heroic job. But those same parents are about to have government support ripped away from them if they need help securing child maintenance payments from their child's other parent. If government proposals go ahead, single parents will have to pay a fee and ongoing charges for the Child Support Agency to collect money from "runaway dads" who refuse to pay voluntarily.

"If the prime minister really wants to support heroic single parents, he must withdraw these damaging proposals which would limit access to the CSA."

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products