Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

ANCILLARY RELIEF/ NON-MATRIMONIAL ASSETS: Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41

Sep 29, 2018, 18:03 PM
Slug : 2011EWCA41
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 3, 2011, 07:10 AM
Article ID : 93709

(Court of Appeal; Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ; 28 January 2011)

The parties separated in 2006 after a 10 year marriage. A company founded by the husband before the marriage was valued at £2 million just before marriage. During the ancillary relief proceedings, the company was sold for £32m, of which the husband received £25m. The wife appealed the decision of Charles J in J v J [2009] EWHC 2654 (Fam). The judge had awarded the wife £5.4m on a clean break basis, of which £400,000 was in respect of her costs. The wife sought, as she had at first instance, £10m.

Held it was not appropriate to capitalise earning capacity as at the date of the marriage and treat it as a capital asset - the judge's approach was wrong (GW v RW overturned). It was however appropriate to incorporate the spring-board effect and passive economic growth into the value of a company at the date of marriage. The court should first divide the assets into matrimonial and non-matrimonial, but often a precise division is unlikely to be required. The sharing principle should then be applied and the overall percentage division considered as a cross check.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from