Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

ANCILLARY RELIEF/ NON-MATRIMONIAL ASSETS: Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41

Sep 29, 2018, 18:03 PM
Slug : 2011EWCA41
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 3, 2011, 07:10 AM
Article ID : 93709

(Court of Appeal; Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ; 28 January 2011)

The parties separated in 2006 after a 10 year marriage. A company founded by the husband before the marriage was valued at £2 million just before marriage. During the ancillary relief proceedings, the company was sold for £32m, of which the husband received £25m. The wife appealed the decision of Charles J in J v J [2009] EWHC 2654 (Fam). The judge had awarded the wife £5.4m on a clean break basis, of which £400,000 was in respect of her costs. The wife sought, as she had at first instance, £10m.

Held it was not appropriate to capitalise earning capacity as at the date of the marriage and treat it as a capital asset - the judge's approach was wrong (GW v RW overturned). It was however appropriate to incorporate the spring-board effect and passive economic growth into the value of a company at the date of marriage. The court should first divide the assets into matrimonial and non-matrimonial, but often a precise division is unlikely to be required. The sharing principle should then be applied and the overall percentage division considered as a cross check.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from