Our authors are experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics experts from a range of related disciplines.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Read on
Card image
Twitter LinkedIn

Christopher Sharp QC

Barrister | St John's Chambers
One of the leading Personal Injury Silks, his practice encompasses both claimant and defendant work, and he is instructed in all areas of personal injury and clinical negligence. It is focused on catastrophic brain and spinal injuries, complex medical causation issues and procedural matters at appellate level. He has extensive experience in the Court of Appeal as well as of conducting cases before the House of Lords. He represents both claimants and defendants and is listed in Chambers UK as 'excelling in catastrophic injury and complex medical causation issues'.

Christopher is also acknowledged as one of the leading family Silks on circuit, he is in constant demand. He is widely known for his expertise in high-value ancillary relief, including those with a foreign element, and ToLATA cases, many of which are dealt with by way of negotiated settlements. In children cases he is instructed by local authorities and parents, as well as the guardian and official solicitor, in cases involving the serious injury or death of a child, in which issues involving complex medical evidence arise and where his expertise in the field of personal injury can also be applied. Issues of privacy, and publicity frequently arise. His experience in personal injury work also translates to cases involving catastrophic injury to one partner where financial complexities in subsequent divorce proceedings surround the damages awarded. He regularly appears in the appellate courts. He sits as a Recorder and Deputy High Court Judge.
See author's page
Twitter LinkedIn
Card image
Twitter LinkedIn
Barrister | St John's Chambers
One of the leading Personal Injury Silks, his practice encompasses both claimant and defendant work, and he is instructed in all areas of personal injury and clinical negligence. It is focused on catastrophic brain and spinal injuries, complex medical causation issues and procedural matters at appellate level. He has extensive experience in the Court of Appeal as well as of conducting cases before the House of Lords. He represents both claimants and defendants and is listed in Chambers UK as 'excelling in catastrophic injury and complex medical causation issues'.

Christopher is also acknowledged as one of the leading family Silks on circuit, he is in constant demand. He is widely known for his expertise in high-value ancillary relief, including those with a foreign element, and ToLATA cases, many of which are dealt with by way of negotiated settlements. In children cases he is instructed by local authorities and parents, as well as the guardian and official solicitor, in cases involving the serious injury or death of a child, in which issues involving complex medical evidence arise and where his expertise in the field of personal injury can also be applied. Issues of privacy, and publicity frequently arise. His experience in personal injury work also translates to cases involving catastrophic injury to one partner where financial complexities in subsequent divorce proceedings surround the damages awarded. He regularly appears in the appellate courts. He sits as a Recorder and Deputy High Court Judge.
View articles See author's page
Articles by author
The article continues Christopher Sharp QC’s regular reviews of the more important recent financial remedy cases, this one covering the period from February 2016 to mid-June 2016.We are cursed with...
The article continues Christopher’s regular reviews of the more important recent financial remedy cases, this one covering the period from October 2015 to the end of February 2016.Amongst the...
This article covers a selection of 13 of the more important financial remedy cases decided in the period from June until September 2015.Arbili v Arbili [2015] EWCA Civ 542 was a needs case where the...
July 2014 has seen several cases reported where the Court of Appeal has had to address the question of apparent bias from judges purporting to exercise their case management or interlocutory functions...
View all articles