(Court of Appeal, Sir Andrew McFarlane P, King, Coulson LJJ, 29 November 2018)
Financial remedies – Lump sum order – Third parties – Appeal – Whether the order was ultra vires
The appeal from a lump sum order against a third party was allowed and the order discharged.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
Neutral Citation Number:  EWCA 3009 (Civ)
Case No: B6/2016/2779
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL) DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM EASTBOURNE FAMILY COURT
(DEPUTY JUDGE AUSTIN)
The Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London WC2A 2LL
Thursday, 29 November 2018
PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
(SIR ANDREW McFARLANE)
LADY JUSTICE KING
LORD JUSTICE COULSON
ELLEN ELIZABETH WODEHOUSE
HENRY WYNDHAM WODEHOUSE
Transcript of Epiq Europe Ltd 165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
This transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.
WARNING: Reporting restrictions may apply to the contents transcribed in this document, particularly if the case concerned a sexual offence or involved a child. Reporting restrictions prohibit the publication of the applicable information to the public or any section of the public, in writing, in a broadcast or by means of the internet, including social media. Anyone who receives a copy of this transcript is responsible in law for making sure that applicable restrictions are not breached. A person who breaches a reporting restriction is liable to a fine and/or imprisonment. For guidance on whether reporting restrictions apply, and to what information, ask at the court office or take legal advice.
Mr P Blatchly (instructed by Stevens & Bolton) appeared on behalf of the Appellant
Mr N Barnes (instructed by Warrens Law and Advocacy) on behalf of the Respondent
Judgment: Wodehouse v Wodehouse  EWCA Civ 3009