Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce
and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email
editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Trending articles
Thorne v Kennedy: why Australia's decision on prenups is important for English law
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
English courts have not yet had the opportunity to consider fully what would constitute undue influence in the context of a prenuptial agreement. But knowing when pressure will amount to undue influence in this jurisdiction is still important not least because calls for contractually binding prenups have resurfaced in recent months.
Even if prenups are not made legislatively binding in the near future the courts since
Radmacher (Formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 [2010] 2 FLR 1900 have taken a fairly restrictive approach when deciding when an imbalance of power between the parties will affect the weight of a prenup on relationship breakdown. This is problematic when the autonomy of one party has been compromised by power inequalities in the relationship and so a new approach is needed.
For this reason the ground-breaking approach of the High Court of Australia in
Thorne v Kennedy [2017] HCA 49 will be of interest and importance for lawyers in England Wales and Northern Ireland. Sharon Thompson's article in the April 2018 issue of
Family Law argues that as well as providing guidance on the operation of undue...
Read the full article here.
