Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Kara Swift
Kara Swift
Associate
Read on

SZ v DG and others [2020] EWHC 881 (Fam)

Date:29 APR 2020
Third slide
Technical Editor

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 14 April 2020)

Public law children – Contact order – Father applied for leave to apply for contact order

The Family Division dismissed the father's application for an order for contact in respect of his son.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 881 (Fam)

Case No: FD20P00031

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 14/04/2020

Before:

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

SZ
Applicant

- and –

DG and PG
First & Second Respondents

- and –

LG

Third Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Miriam Best (instructed by Crosse & Crosse Solicitors LLP) for the applicant
Christopher Watson (instructed by Nottingham City Council) for the Council
The respondents were not present or represented

Hearing date: 1 April 2020

The hearing was conducted remotely of by and through Zoom

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Judgment: SZ v DG [2020] EWHC 881 (Fam)

Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2020 edition due out in May
£589.99
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
Family Law Awards 2020
Family Law Awards 2020
Entries now open!