Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
CARE PROCEEDINGS: Sheffield City Council v V (Legal Services Commission Intervening) [2006] EWHC 1861 (Fam)
Date:23 JUN 2006

(Family Division; Bodey J; 23 June, 2006) [2006] FLR (forthcoming)

In the case of a residential assessment which was within the broad interpretation of the phrase permitted by Re C (Interim Care Order: Residential Assessment) [1997] 1 FLR 1, in which any possible elements of treatment, therapy or training were not integral to the assessment, the assessment could be ordered under s 38(6) of the Children Act 1989. In such a case there was, therefore, no impediment to the costs of the assessment being apportioned between the parties. In the instant case, three of the parties were publicly funded, so that the Legal Services Commission would be liable for 75% of the costs. The court issued guidelines as to the resolution of applications concerning residential assessments under s 38(6) of the Children Act 1989.