Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Ally Tow
Ally Tow
Senior Associate
Read on
HUMAN RIGHTS/PENSIONS: Richards v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Case C-423/04)
Date:27 APR 2006

(European Court of Justice; 27 April 2006) [2006] The Times May 5

The claimant, who had undergone a male to female gender reassignment, sought payment of the retirement pension at the age of 60, which was the retirement age for women. The UK Government refused to pay the claimant a pension until the retirement age for men, which was 65 years. The decision was reached before the Gender Recognition Act 2004 came into effect, therefore a gender recognition certificate had not been issued and could not in any event assist, having no retrospective application.

The decision was discrimination contrary to EU law, amounting to unequal treatment arising from gender reassignment.