(Family Division, Cobb J, 23 October 2019)
Costs – Discretion of court – Inherent jurisdiction
The Family Division made no orders for costs.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 2800 (Fam)
Case No: MB19P00683
FAMILY DIVISION
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 23/10/2019
Before :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :
Applicant
- and -
TR (mother of PR)
Respondents
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Re PR (Application under the inherent jurisdiction: Costs)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jacqueline Thomas (instructed by Switalskis) for the Third Respondent (mother of PR)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Approved Judgment
I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.
.............................
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE COBB
This judgment was delivered in public. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of PR and members of her family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
Judgment: Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council v PR and others [2019] EWHC 2800 (Fam)
