(Theis J, Family Division, 14 March 2019)
Private law children – Relationship breakdown – Change of child’s surname – Contact with child.
The Family Division found that it would be premature to change the child’s surname and that the father should not be made aware of the address of the child’s school or GP.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Neutral Citation No  EWHC 2175 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
Before THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE THEIS
R v P (No 2)
MR A PERKINS appeared for the Applicant Father
MISS H HOLLMANN appeared for the Respondent Mother
MISS S JAFFAR appeared for the Child
14th MARCH 2019
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published. The anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.
Judgment: R v P (No 2)  EWHC 2175 (Fam)