Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Rebecca Delaney
Rebecca Delaney
Director & Partner
Read on
Quan v Bray and others [2017] EWCA Civ 405
Date:21 JUN 2017
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Court of Appeal, King, David Richards and Moylan LJJ, 16 June 2017)

Financial remedies – Trust assets – Appeal from finding that they were not a resource of the parties – Sufficiency of reasoning

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 


Case No: B6/2015/0102

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 405
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT
FAMILY DIVISION (RCJ)
Sir Paul Coleridge sitting as a High Court Judge
[2014] EWHC 3340 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 16/06/2017

Before:

LADY JUSTICE KING
LORD JUSTICE DAVID RICHARDS
and
LORD JUSTICE MOYLAN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Li Quan
Appellant

- and -

Stuart Bray
1st Respondent

Maitland (Mauritius) Ltd
2nd Respondent

Chinese Tigers South African Trust
3rd Respondent

Save China’s Tigers
4th Respondent

Ralph Edmond Bray
5th Respondent

Conservation Finance Limited
6th Respondent

The Attorney General
7th Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Richard Todd QC and Lily Mottahedan (instructed by Vardags Solicitors) for the Appellant
The First Respondent appeared in person
The Second Respondent did not appear and was not represented
The Third Respondent did not appear and was not represented
The Fourth Respondent appeared in person
The Fifth Respondent did not appear and was not represented
Stewart Leech QC and Sarah Phipps (instructed by Lee and Thompson LLP) for the 
6th Respondent
Ruth Hughes (instructed by The Government Legal Department) for the 7th Respondent

Hearing dates : 31 January to 2 February 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment

Quan v Bray and Others [2017] EWCA Civ 405.rtf
Financial Remedies Handbook
Financial Remedies Handbook
Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook...
£91.99
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99