Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 49
Date:9 FEB 2017
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Court of Appeal, Gloster, Lewison and King LJJ, 8 February 2017)

Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Anonymity – Court of Appeal

The application for anonymity in financial remedy proceedings was refused.

The husband and wife were engaged in long-running financial remedy proceedings after a consent order was made in 2005. There had been multiple applications to the court including the Court of Appeal.

At a 2011 hearing in the Court of Appeal an anonymity order was made preventing the naming of the parties. In subsequent appeal proceedings the names of the parties were disclosed and published in the media. The wife sought to continue the previous anonymity order or sought a fresh order to be made.

The application was refused. The Court of Appeal highlighted the key principles regarding anonymity including the principle that only exceptional circumstances could justify a departure from the normal rule of Court of Appeal proceedings being heard in public.


Case No: B6/2015/2451(B)

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 49
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT AT GUILDFORD
Her Honour Judge Raeside
MK03D00837

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 08/02/2017

Before:


LADY JUSTICE GLOSTER
Vice President of the Court Of Appeal, Civil Division
LORD JUSTICE LEWISON
and
LADY JUSTICE KING


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Between:


Tina Norman
Appellant


- and -


Robert Norman
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Matthew Waszak Esq (instructed acting pro bono, instructed by the Bar Pro Bono Unit) for the Appellant
Michael Glaser Esq and Phillip Blatchly Esq (instructed by Bishop & Sewell LLP) for the Respondent
Adam Wolanski Esq (instructed directly) for the Times Newspapers Limited, Associated Newspapers Limited, Telegraph Newspapers Limited, News Group Newspapers Limited and Sky News




Hearing date: 19 January 2017


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment

Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 49.rtf
Financial Remedies Handbook
Financial Remedies Handbook
Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook...
£91.99
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99