Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Read on

MS v RS and BT (Paternity) [2020] EWFC 30

Date:21 MAY 2020
Third slide
Technical Editor

(Family Court, Macdonald J, 22 April 2020)

Private law children – Application for declaration of non-paternity - Family Law Act 1986, s 55A

The Family Court held it was not in the children's best interests to determine, at the present time, the father's application for a declaration of non-paternity in respect of two teenagers.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


 

Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWFC 30

Case No: ZC19P00940

IN THE FAMILY COURT

SITTING AT MANCHESTER

Manchester Civil Justice Centre

Date: 22/04/2020

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

MS
Applicant

- and –

RS
First Respondent

- and -

BT
Second Respondent

- and -

AS and BS
Third and Fourth Respondents

Ms Daisy Hughes (instructed by Vaitlingham Kay) for the Applicant
The First Respondent appeared in person
Ms Margaret Parr (instructed by Brown Turner Ross) for the Second Respondent

Ms Joanna Moody (instructed by Gaynam King & Mellor) for the Third and Fourth Respondents

Hearing dates: 11 and 12 February 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be at 10.30am on 22 April 2020.

MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

This judgment was delivered in private. The Judge has given permission for this anonymised version of the judgment (and any of the facts and matters contained in it) to be published on condition always that the names and the addresses of the parties and the children must not be published. For the avoidance of doubt, the strict prohibition on publishing the names and addresses of the parties and the children will continue to apply where that information has been obtained by using the contents of this judgment to discover information already in the public domain. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that these conditions are strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: MS v RS and BT (Paternity) [2020] EWFC 30

Family Law Awards 2020
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2020 edition due out in May
£589.99