Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Sonny Patel
Sonny Patel
Partner
Read on
MS v MN [2017] EWHC 324 (Fam)
Date:15 MAY 2017
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Family Division, Moor J, 2 February 2017)

Private law children – Contact – Domestic violence – Practice Direction 12J

The mother’s appeal from an order for direct contact between the father and child was allowed.

The parents of the, now 5-year-old, child separated in 2012 when the mother went into a refuge. There had been numerous allegations and counter-allegations ever since.

A fact-finding hearing took place in order to resolve the issue of direct contact with the father. A number of findings were made regarding violence perpetrated by the father and threats to kill the mother. The father’s appeal was dismissed.

On the issue of contact, despite the Cafcass report advising against direct contact the judge found that since violence had not been perpetrated against the child she was not at risk. A period of indirect contact was ordered followed by direct contact to be supervised or supported. The mother appealed.

The appeal was allowed. The judge directed that a s 7 risk assessment of the father should be completed and the matter remitted to the Family Court.

The judge below failed to consider Practice Direction 12J and his judgment did not address why it was right to permit direct contact at this time. The Cafcass officer had serious concerns regarding allegations of the father’s drug use and the fact that drug testing had not been completed yet. Further, given the findings of domestic violence and the father’s pattern of coercive control there was a high risk of future violence.


Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 324 (Fam)

Case No. No. ZC15P00920

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice


Date: Thursday, 2nd February, 2017

Before:

MR. JUSTICE MOOR
(In Private)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


B E T W E E N :

M S
Appellant

- and -

M N
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO.
(a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited)
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
5 New Street Square, London. EC4A 3BF
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


MS. V. MILLER (instructed by Aitken Harter Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Appellant.

THE RESPONDENT appeared in Person.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


J U D G M E N T 
(As approved by the Judge) 

MS v MN [2017] EWHC 324 (Fam).rtf


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports.
Family Law
Family Law
"the principal (monthly) periodical dealing with...
£389
Financial Remedies Handbook
Financial Remedies Handbook
Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook...
£91.99
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99