Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Shazia Haider-Shah
Shazia Haider-Shah
In House Advocate
Read on
MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)
Date:9 JUL 2019
Third slide
Technical Editor

(Family Division, Cohen J, 25 June 2019)

Financial remedies – Marriage – Deed of separation – Divorce – Preliminary issues

The Family Division made findings as to the date of the parties’ separation and found that there had been on marital acquest either during the period up to separation or subsequently.

 


 

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


 

Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)

Case No: ZC17D00215

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 25/06/2019

Before :

Double-click to add the Judges name

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

MB
Applicant

- and –

EB
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr P Mitchell (instructed by Vardags) for the Applicant husband
Mr N Cusworth QC (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the Respondent wife

Hearing dates: 18th – 20th, 25th June

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE COHEN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)

 

Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
Family Law Awards 2019
Family Law Awards 2019
Buy a ticket or book a table today