Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
ANCILLARY RELIEF/JURISDICTION: M v M [2008]
Date:11 JUL 2008

(Family Division; Bodey J; 11 July 2008)

In proceedings in which maintenance pending suit had actually been paid, pending a decision as to jurisdiction or merits, the court had no power to order such payments to be refunded should the payee fail at trial; in the alternative the court would not exercise any such power unless there was some special circumstance. By parity of reasoning, if maintenance pending suit had been unpaid in breach of an order, there was no question of its becoming unenforceable, nor of the order being discharged ab initio so as to eliminate the arrears, merely because of the wife's discontinuance or failure in the proceedings. Therefore, notwithstanding the wife's decision to discontinue her English divorce petition, after a Nigerian court had granted the husband a Nigerian divorce, the husband was still required to pay the wife the arrears of maintenance pending suit. The court had the power to enforce maintenance pending suit by way of a charging order; Wicks v Wicks was to do with the substantive powers of the court pending a decree nisi, not with the use of a charging order as a means of enforcement.