Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
HC (by her litigation friend) v FW [2017] EWHC 3162 (Fam)
Date:19 DEC 2017
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Family Division, Cobb J, 29 November 2017)

Financial remedies – Needs – Wife had complex needs due to brain injury – Husband failed to engage in financial proceedings

In financial remedy proceedings orders were made permitting the wife to retain £11,726,491 of assets and for the husband to pay her a cash lump sum of £3,474,607 to meet her complex needs.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Case No: DH15D02945
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 3162 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 29/11/2017

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE COBB

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

HC
(By Emma Gaudern her litigation friend)
Applicant

- and -

FW
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Timothy Bishop QC and Marina Faggionato (instructed by Stewarts) for the Applicant (wife) (HC)
The Respondent (husband) (FW) was neither present nor represented

Hearing dates: 13 November 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment 

Judgment: HC (by her litigation friend) v FW [2017] EWHC 3162 (Fam).rtf

Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts
"A very good tool for the busy family lawyer"...
£519.99