Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
BANKRUPTCY/PROPERTY: Doodes v Gotham and another [2005] EWHC 2576 (Ch)
Date:17 NOV 2005

(Chancery Division; Lindsay J; 17 November 2005) [2006] BPIR 36, [2006] FLR (forthcoming)

Following the bankruptcy, the trustee allowed the bankrupt and his family to remain in the matrimonial home, taking a charge over the family home. When the trustee sought to enforce the charge over 10 years later, the bankrupt argued that the enforcement was time-barred.

There were strong technical arguments in favour of time-barring the enforcement. Reluctantly, given the strong social reasons for encouraging trustees to postpone sale of matrimonial homes, as had been done here, the trustees application for sale of the property was dismissed as time-barred.