Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
Christoforou v Christoforou [2016] EWHC 2988 (Fam)
Date:5 JUN 2017
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Family Division, Moylan J, 22 November 2016)

Financial remedies – Computation – Onshore and offshore property owning companies – Dispute as to beneficial ownership of shares – Whether assets were marital – Tax liabilities


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 
Orders were made in financial remedy proceedings.

The husband and wife were married for 34 years and had two adult children together. When the marriage broke down the wife applied for financial remedies. An agreed asset schedule revealed total assets of approx. £55m. Largely the assets were held in a number of onshore and offshore property owning companies. Some of the shares of which were held in the wife’s name.

The husband asserted that his father had made substantial gifts to him which signified non-marital wealth and justified a departure from the principle of equality.

The court found that: there had been no relevant non-disclosure by either party; the wife was the beneficial owner of shares held in her name; due to there having already been a significant element of reattribution of sums spent by the husband, his conduct did not justify any further add-back; the husband had failed to prove his case on non-marital contributions.

Due to the need for an assessment of the tax liabilities, which would be broadly shared, final orders could not yet be made.


Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2988 (Fam)
Case No: ZC14D00753
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 22/11/2016

Before:


MR JUSTICE MOYLAN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between:


IBTISSAM ALI CHRISTOFOROU
Applicant


- and -


CHRISTAKIS CHRISTOFOROU
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Mr J. Southgate QC and Mr M. Bradley (instructed by Withers LLP) for the Applicant
Mr C. Howard and Mr A. Tatton-Bennett (instructed by Hughes Fowler Chambers) for the Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment Approved

Christoforou v Christoforou [2016] EWHC 2988 (Fam).rtf
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts
"A very good tool for the busy family lawyer"...
£519.99
Family Law
Family Law
"the principal (monthly) periodical dealing with...
£389
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99