Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Zahra Pabani
Zahra Pabani
Partner - Family Law
Read on
Chai v Peng (No 2) [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)
Date:2 JUN 2014
Law Reporter

(Family Division, Holman J, 1 May 2014)


[The judicially approved judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2015] 1 FLR 637]

Please see the attached file below for the full judgment.

Divorce – Jurisdiction – Maintenance pending suit

The wife was granted permission to withdraw her current divorce petition and issue a fresh one in order to anchor the date for domicile and habitual residence and further orders for maintenance pending suit were made.

The husband and wife were married for 42 years. The wife, who had no independent means, lived in England and Wales and initiated divorce proceedings there while the wealthy husband claimed to be living in Malaysia and brought proceedings there. The issue of jurisdiction was scheduled to be heard later in the year but the wife applied for maintenance pending suit and also for permission to issue a fresh divorce petition in order to anchor the date for which domicile and habitual residence were decided which she argued would eliminate areas of dispute from the jurisdiction proceedings. The wife was granted permission to withdraw her petition and issue fresh proceedings.

The judge further ordered the wife be paid £35,000 pm pending the jurisdiction hearing, £60,000 to cover the costs of further negotiations and £30,000 pm for legal costs. The wife’s application for an order for £115,000 to discharge her outstanding legal costs was refused.

The fully referenced, judicially approved judgment and headnote will appear in a forthcoming issue of Family Law Reports. A detailed summary and analysis of the case will appear in Family Law. __________________________________________________________________

Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)
     No. FD13D00747
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
     FAMILY DIVISION
     Royal Courts of Justice

1st May 2014

B e f o r e :

MR JUSTICE HOLMAN (sitting throughout in public) 

___________________

PAULINE SIEW PHIN CHAI
 Petitioner

- and -

TAN SRI DR KHOO KAY PENG
 Respondent

____________________

MR R. TODD QC and MR N. YATES (instructed by Vardags) appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
     MR T. BISHOP QC, MRS R. BAILEY-HARRIS and MISS K. COOK (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) appeared on behalf of the respondent.

____________________

JUDGMENT


Chai v Peng (No 2) [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)

Article continues below...