Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Kara Swift
Kara Swift
Associate
Read on

A London Borough v X and others (Wardship: Parental Responsibility; Deprivation of Liberty) [2019] EWHC B16 (Fam)

Date:8 JAN 2020
Third slide
Technical Editor

(Family Division, Theis J, 12 December 2019)

Public law children – Wardship – Parental Responsibility – Deprivation of liberty

The Family Division held that wardship proceedings should continue, any restriction on the mother's parental responsibility should be made in those proceedings and the care provided for the child amounted to a deprivation of liberty.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number:

Case No: ZE19C00172

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 12/12/2019

Before:

MRS JUSTICE THEIS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

A London Borough
Applicant

- and -

X
(by her Litigation Friend the Official Solicitor
1st Respondent

- and -

Y
2nd Respondent

- and -

Z (By his children’s Guardian)
3rd Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ms Elpha Lecointe (instructed by LA) for the Applicant
Mr Nicholas O’Brien (instructed by Hudgell and Partners on behalf of the Official Solicitor) for the 1st Respondent
Ms Martha Cover (instructed by Hanne and Co) for the 2nd Respondent
Ms Maud Davis (instructed by Freemans Solicitors) for the 3rd Respondent

Hearing date: 25th and 28th November 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MRS JUSTICE THEIS

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published. The anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: A London Borough v X and others (Wardship_Parental Responsibility_Deprivation of Liberty) [2019] EWHC B16 (Fam)

Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2020 edition due out in May
£589.99
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99