Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

XW and XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44

Oct 1, 2018, 05:12 AM
Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media
The court made a reporting restriction order precluding the publication of any information relating to the proceedings save for an anonymised and redacted version of the judgment of Baker J.
Slug : xw-and-xh-no-2-2018-ewfc-44
Meta Title : XW and XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44
Meta Keywords : Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 27, 2018, 08:39 AM
Article ID : 117244

(Family Court, Baker J, 19 June 2018)

Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media

The court made a reporting restriction order precluding the publication of any information relating to the proceedings save for an anonymised and redacted version of the judgment of Baker J.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWFC 44
Case No: ZC15D04000
IN THE FAMILY COURT

IN THE MATTER OF THE MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT 1973
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 19 June 2018


Before :

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

XW
Applicant

- and -

XH
(No.2)
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Desmond Browne QC, Lucy Stone QC, Duncan Brooks and Caroline Addy (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP) for the Petitioner
Martin Pointer QC and Rebecca Carew Pole (instructed by Sears Tooth) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 26 February 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the parties and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment: 
XW and XH (No 2) [2018] EWFC 44.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Publicity and Reporting
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from