Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

XW and XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44

Oct 1, 2018, 05:12 AM
Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media
The court made a reporting restriction order precluding the publication of any information relating to the proceedings save for an anonymised and redacted version of the judgment of Baker J.
Slug : xw-and-xh-no-2-2018-ewfc-44
Meta Title : XW and XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44
Meta Keywords : Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 27, 2018, 08:39 AM
Article ID : 117244

(Family Court, Baker J, 19 June 2018)

Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media

The court made a reporting restriction order precluding the publication of any information relating to the proceedings save for an anonymised and redacted version of the judgment of Baker J.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWFC 44
Case No: ZC15D04000
IN THE FAMILY COURT

IN THE MATTER OF THE MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT 1973
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 19 June 2018


Before :

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

XW
Applicant

- and -

XH
(No.2)
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Desmond Browne QC, Lucy Stone QC, Duncan Brooks and Caroline Addy (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP) for the Petitioner
Martin Pointer QC and Rebecca Carew Pole (instructed by Sears Tooth) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 26 February 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the parties and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment: 
XW and XH (No 2) [2018] EWFC 44.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Publicity and Reporting
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from