Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

XW and XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44

Oct 1, 2018, 05:12 AM
Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media
The court made a reporting restriction order precluding the publication of any information relating to the proceedings save for an anonymised and redacted version of the judgment of Baker J.
Slug : xw-and-xh-no-2-2018-ewfc-44
Meta Title : XW and XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44
Meta Keywords : Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 27, 2018, 08:39 AM
Article ID : 117244

(Family Court, Baker J, 19 June 2018)

Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media

The court made a reporting restriction order precluding the publication of any information relating to the proceedings save for an anonymised and redacted version of the judgment of Baker J.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWFC 44
Case No: ZC15D04000
IN THE FAMILY COURT

IN THE MATTER OF THE MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT 1973
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 19 June 2018


Before :

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

XW
Applicant

- and -

XH
(No.2)
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Desmond Browne QC, Lucy Stone QC, Duncan Brooks and Caroline Addy (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP) for the Petitioner
Martin Pointer QC and Rebecca Carew Pole (instructed by Sears Tooth) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 26 February 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the parties and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment: 
XW and XH (No 2) [2018] EWFC 44.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Publicity and Reporting
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from