Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
View all articles
Authors

MEDICAL TREATMENT: Wyatt v Portsmouth NHS Trust and Wyatt (by her Guardian CAFCASS) [2005] EWHC 693 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:34 PM
Slug : wyatt-v-portsmouth-nhs-trust-and-wyatt-by-her-guardian-cafcass-2005-ewhc-693-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 21, 2005, 11:26 AM
Article ID : 88463

(21 April 2005; Hedley J; Family Division) [2005] 2 FLR 480

The parents of a severely brain-damaged child suffering from a chronic respiratory disease which made her dependent on oxygen from a head box or oxygen mask, applied to have declarations that there should be 'no resuscitation' discharged. The child, now 18 months old, had unexpectedly survived the winter, her oxygen dependency had reduced from 100% to 50% and she was now able to respond to loud noises and to track movement. In the event of respiratory collapse all treatment up to but not including intubation and ventilation would be in the child's best interests, but nothing further. The child's day to day life was not intolerable any longer, and the medical professionals agreed that every reasonable step short of major invasive treatment should be employed as necessary to sustain life. However, the child was most unlikely to survive the expected respiratory crisis no matter what aggressive intervention was tried, and such intervention would imperil a peaceful death. If she did survive such intervention, it would be at the likely cost of significant deterioration in her condition to the point where life would again be intolerable on a day to day basis.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from