Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

Wooldridge v Wooldridge (Case No: 3CL1022132)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:45 PM
Inheritance – Wife’s claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants Act) 1975 – Submission that the family lived an extravagant lifestyle – Whether the will made adequate provision for the wife
The wife’s claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants Act) 1975 was refused.
Slug : wooldridge-v-wooldrige-case-no-3cl1022132
Meta Title : Wooldridge v Wooldridge (Case No:3CL1022132)
Meta Keywords : Inheritance – Wife’s claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants Act) 1975 – Submission that the family lived an extravagant lifestyle – Whether the will made adequate provision for the wife
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 16, 2016, 04:59 AM
Article ID : 116863

(Central London County Court, HHJ Walden-Smith)

Inheritance – Wife’s claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants Act) 1975 – Submission that the family lived an extravagant lifestyle – Whether the will made adequate provision for the wife

The wife’s claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants Act) 1975 was refused.

The husband and wife were married for 11 years and had been in a relationship for 15 years at the time of the husband's death following a helicopter crash. They had one child together, aged 6, and the husband had a son from a previous relationship, aged 22.

The wife brought proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 claiming that her husband's will failed to make adequate provision for her. She was awarded that matrimonial property, mortgage-free, which was now worth £4m-£4.25m. The will, which was home-made without legal advice being taken, also directed the husband's company to pay her £75,000 pa, but that gift failed as it was not open to the husband to direct the company to make such a provision. Both sons inherited shares in the husband's construction business.

The family had also received compensation under the Fatal Accidentals (Northern Ireland) Order 1977. The wife received £.1985m, the youngest child received £200,000, and the older son received £315,000. During those proceedings a report was prepared on the family's financial dependency on the husband and found that annual income was just under £100,000 and actual expenditure was just about that. Those findings undermined the wife's claim that their annual expenditure was over £370,000 pa.

The wife had assets of her own, following her successful career in advertising, amounting to £10.5m, including properties which were capable of generating income.

During the marriage the wife submitted that they lived an extravagant lifestyle and she claimed that the husband would have wished for her to be left with more than just the property. However, the type of lifestyle she referred to was not supported by the financial evidence.

Her claims regarding the level of expenditure were inflated and in reality the highest level at which her needs could be assessed was £240,000 pa. The younger child's award from the fatal accident claim and rent in respect of a property the husband had left him should be used for his living expenses now and not, as the wife had done, placed into investments for his future.

The wife had been a successful businesswoman whose abilities could still generate a good income, despite her being out of the advertising industry for 7 years. She was certainly not incapable of obtaining suitable and lucrative employment.

She had failed to demonstrate that the will did not provide her with sufficient financial provision to meet her needs.Furthermore, the older son was dependent on the business partnership and its assets for his income and accommodation. If the wife was awarded a further provision it would likely involve partnership assets being sols which would have a profoundly negative effect on the older son and his family, and also on the younger son's interest in the business.Furthermore, the total value of the estate was not of a size to support the wife's claim.

Case No: 3CL1022132

In the County Court at Central London

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF IAN JAMES WOOLDRIDGE (DECEASED)
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INHERITANCE (PROVISION FOR FAMILY AND DEPENDANTS) ACT 1975


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

BEFORE:


Her Honour Judge Karen Walden-Smith

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

BETWEEN:

THANDI STRATFORD WOOLDRIDGE
Claimant

and

(1) GRAHAM JOHN WOOLDRIDGE
(2) JULIE ANN ELIZABETH WOOLDRIDGE
(3) CHARLOTTE CECILIA WOOLDRIDGE
(4) CHARLES JAMES WOOLDRIDGE
(5) RHETT ARTEMAS WOOLDRIDGE (A CHILD, BY HIS LITIGATION FRIEND SUZANNE MARRIOTT)
Defendants

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Wooldridge v Wooldridge (Case No 3CL1022132)

JUDGMENT
Categories :
  • Inheritance
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from