Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

Whose law is it anyway? Applicable law post-Moore

Sep 29, 2018, 17:08 PM
Moore v Moore [2007] EWCA Civ 361, [2007] FLR (forthcoming) is a further extension of the policy over recent years of the English family courts transferring English cases to the courts of the country whose laws, procedures or agreements are the subject of the dispute, on the basis that the local courts are much better placed to deal with local law matters.
Slug : whose-law-is-it-anyway-applicable-law-post-moore
Meta Title : Whose law is it anyway? Applicable law post-Moore
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 18, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87021

David Hodson, English and Australian solicitor and mediator and Deputy District Judge, Principal Registry of the Family Division. Moore v Moore [2007] EWCA Civ 361, [2007] FLR (forthcoming) is a further extension of the policy over recent years of the English family courts transferring English cases to the courts of the country whose laws, procedures or agreements are the subject of the dispute, on the basis that the local courts are much better placed to deal with local law matters. This article examines the impact of the Moore case against the background of pressure from Brussels to adopt applicable law (applying the law of the country with which the parties have the closest connection). The jurisprudence in Moore is starkly against applicable law and Brussels II yet stunningly in accordance with Brussels I and international comity. Looking at the background to the case and considering Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, applicable law and Brussels I, the author considers the longer term implications of Moore and the need to resist pressure to opt in to Rome III. For the full article see July [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from