Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles
Authors

Who blinks first? Disputes between the court and the local authority in respect of the care plan and welfare of the child

Oct 29, 2019, 16:33 PM
This article attempts to highlight some common difficulties which arise, considering the recent authorities and beyond.
Slug :
Meta Title : Who blinks first? Disputes between the court and the local authority in respect of the care plan and welfare of the child
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 29, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

Simon Wilkinson, Parklane Plowden Chambers

What happens when the court and the local authority disagree over the most appropriate care plan for the child? The President of the Family Division recently considered the jurisprudence and approved of the correct process which should be undertaken in Re T–S (Children: Care Proceedings) [2019] EWCA Civ 742, [2019] 2 FLR 760. This article attempts to highlight some common difficulties which arise, considering the recent authorities and beyond. Ultimately all professionals working within the family justice system are aiming for the same end point: orders and care plans which meet the needs of the children. In order to do this a process of mutual respect must be undertaken with each player knowing their roles and the roles and obligations of the other. The court is the ultimate arbiter of risk and welfare decisions during care proceedings and this must be respected. Within this piece the guidance from the senior courts on how this can best be achieved will be summarised in order to avoid situations in which a Mexican stand-off leads to an unedifying spectacle. 


The full article will be published in the November issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from