Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Who blinks first? Disputes between the court and the local authority in respect of the care plan and welfare of the child

Oct 29, 2019, 16:33 PM
This article attempts to highlight some common difficulties which arise, considering the recent authorities and beyond.
Slug :
Meta Title : Who blinks first? Disputes between the court and the local authority in respect of the care plan and welfare of the child
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 29, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

Simon Wilkinson, Parklane Plowden Chambers

What happens when the court and the local authority disagree over the most appropriate care plan for the child? The President of the Family Division recently considered the jurisprudence and approved of the correct process which should be undertaken in Re T–S (Children: Care Proceedings) [2019] EWCA Civ 742, [2019] 2 FLR 760. This article attempts to highlight some common difficulties which arise, considering the recent authorities and beyond. Ultimately all professionals working within the family justice system are aiming for the same end point: orders and care plans which meet the needs of the children. In order to do this a process of mutual respect must be undertaken with each player knowing their roles and the roles and obligations of the other. The court is the ultimate arbiter of risk and welfare decisions during care proceedings and this must be respected. Within this piece the guidance from the senior courts on how this can best be achieved will be summarised in order to avoid situations in which a Mexican stand-off leads to an unedifying spectacle. 


The full article will be published in the November issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from