Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

What’s wrong with linear judgments? (£)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:04 PM
family law, linear judgments, social work evidence, care plans
In a series of cases over the last 12 months, starting with the judgment of McFarlane LJ in Re G (Care Proceedings: Welfare Evaluation) [2013] EWCA Civ 965, [2014] 1 FLR 670 judges have condemned social work evidence and lower court decisions in care proceedings because they were based on ‘linear judgements’.
Slug : what-s-wrong-with-linear-judgments-07b26d8e-7fb2-44a3-b455-d78fcfd34cc9
Meta Title : What’s wrong with linear judgments?
Meta Keywords : family law, linear judgments, social work evidence, care plans
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 3, 2014, 03:24 AM
Article ID : 106903
Family Law

JUDITH MASSON, Professor of Socio-legal Studies, Bristol University

In a series of cases over the last 12 months, starting with the judgment of McFarlane LJ in Re G (Care Proceedings: Welfare Evaluation) [2013] EWCA Civ 965, [2014] 1 FLR 670 judges have condemned social work evidence and lower court decisions in care proceedings because they were based on ‘linear judgements’.

This paper questions the basis of the criticism by examining how the term ‘linear judgment’ is used in the courts, the potential defects of such judgments and how else the term may be understood. It makes the case for acknowledging a hierarchy of care plans, consistent with obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights, Art 8 and the requirements on local authorities in Children Act 1989, s 22C.

In considering what options are ‘realistic’, courts should be more aware of research evidence, particularly on the difficulties of successful re-unification of children with their parents. Assessments, and evidence of social work witnesses, should include analysis which provides a clear chain of reasoning linking the child’s needs and carers’ capacity to meet these with the proposed plan, order or placement. So far as possible, this should be written in a way that service users can understand. The requirements for timely decision-making should also apply to appeals.

The full version of this article appears in the September 2014 issue of Family Law.

Online subscribers can access the full article here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Family_Law
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from