Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Lockdown 2: how does it affect child contact?
No sooner had clarity been obtained as to how child contact would work within and across the tier system, than the government announced its suspension in England.  From 5 November 2020, a 4-week...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
View all articles
Authors

Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 727

Sep 29, 2018, 22:22 PM
Financial remedies – Sharing principle – Husband’s post-separation income as a result of marital endeavour – Whether wife was entitled to share rather than maintenance on needs basis
The wife’s appeal, launched on the basis that she was entitled to share the husband’s post-separation income, was dismissed.
Slug : waggott-v-waggott-2018-ewca-civ-727
Meta Title : Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 727
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Sharing principle – Husband’s post-separation income as a result of marital endeavour – Whether wife was entitled to share rather than maintenance on needs basis
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 17, 2018, 08:09 AM
Article ID : 116477

(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, Moylan, MacDonald LJJ, 11 April 2018)

Financial remedies – Sharing principle – Husband’s post-separation income as a result of marital endeavour – Whether wife was entitled to share rather than maintenance on needs basis

The wife’s appeal, launched on the basis that she was entitled to share the husband’s post-separation income, was dismissed.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Case No: B6/2016/0784
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 727
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM
RECORDER TIDBURY
SITTING AS A JUDGE OF THE FAMILY COURT
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 11/04/2018
Before :

SIR JAMES MUNBY PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
LORD JUSTICE MOYLAN
and
MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

KIM WAGGOTT
Appellant

- and -

WILLIAM H WAGGOTT
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr James Turner QC and Mr Thomas Dance (instructed by BP Collins LLP) for the Appellant
Mr Nigel Dyer QC and Ms Lily Mottahedan (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 29th and 30th November 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment



 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from