Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles

VULNERABLE ADULT: Re HM; PM v KH and HM (By the Official Solicitor); States of Guernsey Interested Party [2010] EWHC 870 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:52 PM
Slug : vulnerable-adult-re-hm-pm-v-kh-and-hm-by-the-official-solicitor-states-of-guernsey-interested-party-2010-ewhc-870-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 13, 2010, 09:25 AM
Article ID : 90885

(Family Division; Munby LJ sitting as a judge of the Family Division; 30 April 2010)

The court ordered the placing of an adult in a residential home with contact to parents. The placement was terminated because of the father's behaviour. The court concluded that a new placement order with contact to parents was in the adult's best interests. While the order was being drafted the father retained the adult, then when the final version of the order was sent to the parties, the father removed the adult to Israel, in breach of the order. A series of court orders were made to ensure that the father returned with the adult. A Guernsey court was also invited to assist. Proceedings were initiated in Israel and Israeli authorities arranged for the adult to be placed in the mother's care. Shortly afterwards the authorities permitted the mother and the adult to return to England.

The judgment explains why the court is entitled to make certain orders intended to secure an adult's return, by analogy with jurisdiction in child cases, in particular the power of the court to order third parties to provide information and the court's powers to seize or block abducting parent's access to funds. The case also considered some general issue of ‘abduction' of vulnerable adults.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from