Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

VULNERABLE ADULT: Re HM; PM v KH and HM (By the Official Solicitor); States of Guernsey Interested Party [2010] EWHC 870 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:52 PM
Slug : vulnerable-adult-re-hm-pm-v-kh-and-hm-by-the-official-solicitor-states-of-guernsey-interested-party-2010-ewhc-870-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 13, 2010, 09:25 AM
Article ID : 90885

(Family Division; Munby LJ sitting as a judge of the Family Division; 30 April 2010)

The court ordered the placing of an adult in a residential home with contact to parents. The placement was terminated because of the father's behaviour. The court concluded that a new placement order with contact to parents was in the adult's best interests. While the order was being drafted the father retained the adult, then when the final version of the order was sent to the parties, the father removed the adult to Israel, in breach of the order. A series of court orders were made to ensure that the father returned with the adult. A Guernsey court was also invited to assist. Proceedings were initiated in Israel and Israeli authorities arranged for the adult to be placed in the mother's care. Shortly afterwards the authorities permitted the mother and the adult to return to England.

The judgment explains why the court is entitled to make certain orders intended to secure an adult's return, by analogy with jurisdiction in child cases, in particular the power of the court to order third parties to provide information and the court's powers to seize or block abducting parent's access to funds. The case also considered some general issue of ‘abduction' of vulnerable adults.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from