Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

VULNERABLE ADULT: Re HM; PM v KH and HM (By the Official Solicitor); States of Guernsey Interested Party [2010] EWHC 870 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:52 PM
Slug : vulnerable-adult-re-hm-pm-v-kh-and-hm-by-the-official-solicitor-states-of-guernsey-interested-party-2010-ewhc-870-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 13, 2010, 09:25 AM
Article ID : 90885

(Family Division; Munby LJ sitting as a judge of the Family Division; 30 April 2010)

The court ordered the placing of an adult in a residential home with contact to parents. The placement was terminated because of the father's behaviour. The court concluded that a new placement order with contact to parents was in the adult's best interests. While the order was being drafted the father retained the adult, then when the final version of the order was sent to the parties, the father removed the adult to Israel, in breach of the order. A series of court orders were made to ensure that the father returned with the adult. A Guernsey court was also invited to assist. Proceedings were initiated in Israel and Israeli authorities arranged for the adult to be placed in the mother's care. Shortly afterwards the authorities permitted the mother and the adult to return to England.

The judgment explains why the court is entitled to make certain orders intended to secure an adult's return, by analogy with jurisdiction in child cases, in particular the power of the court to order third parties to provide information and the court's powers to seize or block abducting parent's access to funds. The case also considered some general issue of ‘abduction' of vulnerable adults.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from