Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

Vrtar v Croatia (Application no 39380/13

Sep 29, 2018, 22:48 PM
Financial remedies – Maintenance – Enforcement – Delay – Ineffective response
The European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Art 6 of the European Convention regarding the Government’s delay and ineffective measures to enforce a maintenance order.
Slug : vrtar-v-croatia-application-no-39380-13
Meta Title : Vrtar v Croatia (Application no 39380/13
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Maintenance – Enforcement – Delay – Ineffective response
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 18, 2016, 07:53 AM
Article ID : 111371
(European Court of Human Rights, 7 January 2016)

Financial remedies – Maintenance – Enforcement – Delay – Ineffective response

The European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Art 6 of the European Convention regarding the Government’s delay and ineffective measures to enforce a maintenance order.


FIRST SECTION 


CASE OF VRTAR v. CROATIA
(Application no. 39380/13)



JUDGMENT



STRASBOURG


7 January 2016


Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from