Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Vladimir Ushakov v Russia (Application no. 15122/17)

Jun 27, 2019, 10:49 AM
Abduction – Hague Convention – Wife took child to Russia – Father’s request for the return of child rejected by Russian courts.
The ECHR held that the husband’s Art 8 ECHR rights had been breached and made an award for damages.
Slug :
Meta Title : Vladimir Ushakov v Russia (Application no. 15122/17)
Meta Keywords : Abduction – Hague Convention – Wife took child to Russia – Father’s request for the return of child rejected by Russian courts.
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 26, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(European Court of Human Rights, 18 June 2019)

Abduction – Hague Convention – Wife took child to Russia – Father’s request for the return of child rejected by Russian courts.

The ECHR held that the husband’s Art 8 ECHR rights had been breached and made an award for damages.

 


 

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


 

THIRD SECTION

CASE OF VLADIMIR USHAKOV v. RUSSIA

(Application no. 15122/17)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

18 June 2019

This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the

Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

 

Judgment: Vladimir Ushakov v Russia (Application no. 15122/17)

 

 

 

 

Categories :
  • Abduction
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from