Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The Legal Rights and Wrongs of Puberty Blocking in England
Hannah Hirst, PhD student, University of Liverpool, School of Law and Social JusticeKeywords: Puberty blockers – children’s rights – access to health – UNCRC –...
Re M (Special Guardianship Order: Leave To Apply To Discharge) [2021] EWCA Civ 442
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Peter Jackson, Baker, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 26 March 2021)Public Law Children – Special guardianship – Leave to apply to discharge SGO – Refusal...
AB v CD & Ors [2021] EWHC 741 (Fam)
(Family Division, Lieven J, 26 March 2021)Medical treatment - Gender Dysphoria – Consent – Young person prescribed puberty blockers – Decision in Bell – Whether parents could...
Re H-N And Others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings) [2021] EWCA Civ 448
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), President, King, Holroyde LJJ, 30 March 2021)Private law children - Domestic Abuse – Fact finding – ApproachThe Court of Appeal provided guidance in four...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
View all articles
Authors

Versteegh v Versteegh [2018] EWCA Civ 1050

Sep 29, 2018, 23:20 PM
Financial remedies – Business interests – Valuation not possible – Wells order - Appeal
The wife’s appeal from a financial remedy order was dismissed.
Slug : versteegh-v-versteegh-2018-ewca-civ-1050
Meta Title : Versteegh v Versteegh [2018] EWCA Civ 1050
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Business interests – Valuation not possible – Wells order - Appeal
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 16, 2018, 05:22 AM
Article ID : 117147

(Court of Appeal, Lewison, King, Holroyde LJJ, 10 May 2018)

Financial remedies – Business interests – Valuation not possible – Wells order - Appeal

The wife’s appeal from a financial remedy order was dismissed.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 1050
Case No: B6/2017/0418

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
(FAMILY DIVISION)
Sir Peter Singer
ZC14D01200
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 10/05/2018

Before:

LORD JUSTICE LEWISON
LADY JUSTICE KING
and
LORD JUSTICE HOLROYDE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Camilla Eva Carin Versteegh
Appellant

- and -

Gerard Mikael Versteegh
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Timothy Bishop QC, Mr Terence Mowschenson QC and Mr Richard Sear (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach Solicitors) for the Appellant
Mr Lewis Marks QC and Ms Elizabeth Clarke (instructed by Withers LLP) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 7 – 8 February 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved

Judgment: Versteegh v Versteegh [2018] EWCA Civ 1050.rtf

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from