Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Venables and another v News Group Papers Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 494 (Fam)

Mar 13, 2019, 12:03 PM
Publicity and reporting – Anonymity order for life – Child offenders – James Bulger murder – Subsequent offending – Whether the order should be varied to permit reporting of the recent offending
The application to vary or discharge the lifelong anonymity order in respect of ‘Jon Venables’ was refused.
Slug :
Meta Title : Venables and another v News Group Papers Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 494 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Publicity and reporting – Anonymity order for life – Child offenders – James Bulger murder – Subsequent offending – Whether the order should be varied to permit reporting of the recent offending
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 13, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane P, 4 March 2019)

Publicity and reporting – Anonymity order for life – Child offenders – James Bulger murder – Subsequent offending – Whether the order should be varied to permit reporting of the recent offending

The application to vary or discharge the lifelong anonymity order in respect of ‘Jon Venables’ was refused.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 494

Case No: FD18F00008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 04/03/2019

Before :

SIR ANDREW MCFARLANE

PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

(1) Jon Venables
(2) Robert Thompson
Claimants

- and –

(1) News Group Papers Limited
(2) Associated Newspapers Limited MGN Limited
Defendants

- and -

(1) Ralph Stephen Bulger
(2) James Patrick Bulger
Applicants

The second Claimant and the Defendants did not appear

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sir James Eadie QC and Mr Simon Pritchard. (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General
Edward Fitzgerald QC and Mr. Jonathan Price (instructed by Bhatt- Murphy) for the claimants
Mr. Robin Makin (of E. Makin & Co) appeared for the Applicants

Hearing date: 26th February 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

SIR ANDREW MCFARLANE PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Venables and another v News Group Papers Ltd [2019] EWHC 49

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Publicity and Reporting
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from