Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Will government vouchers prove a game-changer for family mediation?
Analysis of data to evaluate the government’s £500 family mediation voucher scheme is in full swing. It’s not yet complete but, as the initiative nears an end, the signs appear...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
Recently, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making misogyny a...
Guidance on allocation and gatekeeping for public children proceedings to remain in place
On 5 June 2020, the President of the Family Division made two amendments to his Guidance on Allocation and Gatekeeping for Care, Supervision and other Proceedings under Part IV of the Children...
Key challenges and the role of the family advisor in facilitating a successful succession plan
Kelly Noel-Smith, Private Client Partner, Forsters LLPRosie Schumm, Family Partner, Forsters LLPAnna Ferster, Family Associate, Forsters LLPHow best to pass on wealth to the next generation is a...
View all articles
Authors

Veluppillai v Chief Land Registrar and Others [2017] EWHC 1693 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:09 PM
Practice and procedure – Strike out – Financial remedies – Property transfer – Husband’s claim of identity fraud
The husband’s claim of identity fraud was struck out.
Slug : veluppillai-v-chief-land-registrar-and-others-2017-ewhc-1693-fam
Meta Title : Veluppillai v Chief Land Registrar and Others [2017] EWHC 1693 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Practice and procedure – Strike out – Financial remedies – Property transfer – Husband’s claim of identity fraud
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 18, 2017, 04:36 AM
Article ID : 114311

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 11 April 2017)

Practice and procedure – Strike out – Financial remedies – Property transfer – Husband’s claim of identity fraud

The husband’s claim of identity fraud was struck out.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Case No: C02CL600/C02CL601

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 1693 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL


11th April 2017

BEFORE:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

BETWEEN:

MICHAEL VELUPPILLAI
Claimant

-and-

(1) THE CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR
First Defendant/Applicant

(2) ANUSHIYA VELLUPILLAI
Second Defendant

(3) BANK OF SCOTLAND
Third Defendant/Applicant

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

APPEARANCES:

For the Claimant: The Claimant appeared in person by telephone link and was not represented
For the First Defendant: Mr Raj Kumar Arumugam of Counsel
For the Second Defendant: The Second Defendant did not appear and was not represented
For the Third Defendant: Mr Edward Jones of Counsel

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

Judgment:
 Veluppillai v Chief Land Registrar and Others [2017] EWHC 1693 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from