(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 April 2019)
Practice and procedure – Disclosure – Disclosure order – Non-compliance – FLR 4.1(6)/ s 31F)(6), Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
The husband’s application under FPR 4.1(6) and/or s 31F(6) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 for an order varying or revoking the disclosure order was refused.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWFC 25
Case No: ZC15D04127
IN THE FAMILY COURT
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 16/04/2019
MR JUSTICE MOSTYN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :
CATIA MARION THUM
Applicant
- and -
Respondent
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rebecca Carew Pole (instructed by Katz Partners LLP) for the Applicant
Philip Marshall QC (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the Respondent
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Approved Judgment
I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.
.............................
MR JUSTICE MOSTYN
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children of the family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
Judgment: Thum v Thum [2019] EWFC 25
Order by
Newest on top Oldest on top