Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Thum v Thum [2019] EWFC 25

Apr 25, 2019, 15:05 PM
Practice and procedure – Disclosure – Disclosure order – Non-compliance – FLR 4.1(6)/ s 31F)(6), Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
The husband’s application under FPR 4.1(6) and/or s 31F(6) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 for an order varying or revoking the disclosure order was refused.
Slug :
Meta Title : Thum v Thum [2019] EWFC 25
Meta Keywords : Practice and procedure – Disclosure – Disclosure order – Non-compliance – FLR 4.1(6)/ s 31F)(6), Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 24, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 April 2019)

Practice and procedure – Disclosure – Disclosure order – Non-compliance – FLR 4.1(6)/ s 31F)(6), Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984

The husband’s application under FPR 4.1(6) and/or s 31F(6) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 for an order varying or revoking the disclosure order was refused.

 


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWFC 25

Case No: ZC15D04127

IN THE FAMILY COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 16/04/2019

Before :

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

CATIA MARION THUM
Applicant

- and -

OLIVER THUM

Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Rebecca Carew Pole (instructed by Katz Partners LLP) for the Applicant
Philip Marshall QC (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 10 April 2019


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children of the family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Thum v Thum [2019] EWFC 25

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from