Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)
Sep 29, 2018, 19:32 PM
Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR
The court held that the wife had served the divorce petition with reasonable promptitude and any delay had not been strategic so as to constitute an abuse of process.
Slug :
thum-v-thum-2016-ewhc-2634-fam
Meta Title :
Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)
Meta Keywords :
Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
No
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
No
Date :
Nov 1, 2016, 05:12 AM
Article ID :
113291
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 21 October 2016)
Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR
The court held that the wife had served the divorce petition with reasonable promptitude and any delay had not been strategic so as to constitute an abuse of process.
Case No: ZC15D04127
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 21/10/2016
Before:
MR JUSTICE MOSTYN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between:
CATJA MARION THUM
Petitioner
- and -
OLIVER THUM
Respondent
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Martin Pointer QC and Rebecca Carew-Pole (instructed by Schillings) for the Petitioner
Christopher Pocock QC (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the Respondent
Hearing dates: 20 October 2016
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment
Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
- Judgments
- Practice and Procedure
Provider :
Order by
Newest on top Oldest on top