Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:32 PM
Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR
The court held that the wife had served the divorce petition with reasonable promptitude and any delay had not been strategic so as to constitute an abuse of process.
Slug : thum-v-thum-2016-ewhc-2634-fam
Meta Title : Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 1, 2016, 05:12 AM
Article ID : 113291

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 21 October 2016)

Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR

The court held that the wife had served the divorce petition with reasonable promptitude and any delay had not been strategic so as to constitute an abuse of process.


Case No: ZC15D04127

Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 21/10/2016

Before:


MR JUSTICE MOSTYN


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Between:


CATJA MARION THUM
Petitioner


- and -


OLIVER THUM
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Martin Pointer QC and Rebecca Carew-Pole (instructed by Schillings) for the Petitioner
Christopher Pocock QC (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the Respondent


Hearing dates: 20 October 2016


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment

Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from