Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:32 PM
Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR
The court held that the wife had served the divorce petition with reasonable promptitude and any delay had not been strategic so as to constitute an abuse of process.
Slug : thum-v-thum-2016-ewhc-2634-fam
Meta Title : Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 1, 2016, 05:12 AM
Article ID : 113291

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 21 October 2016)

Practice and procedure – Divorce – Service of petition – BIIR

The court held that the wife had served the divorce petition with reasonable promptitude and any delay had not been strategic so as to constitute an abuse of process.


Case No: ZC15D04127

Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 21/10/2016

Before:


MR JUSTICE MOSTYN


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Between:


CATJA MARION THUM
Petitioner


- and -


OLIVER THUM
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Martin Pointer QC and Rebecca Carew-Pole (instructed by Schillings) for the Petitioner
Christopher Pocock QC (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the Respondent


Hearing dates: 20 October 2016


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment

Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from