Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re M (Special Guardianship Order: Leave To Apply To Discharge) [2021] EWCA Civ 442
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Peter Jackson, Baker, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 26 March 2021)Public Law Children – Special guardianship – Leave to apply to discharge SGO – Refusal...
AB v CD & Ors [2021] EWHC 741 (Fam)
(Family Division, Lieven J, 26 March 2021)Medical treatment - Gender Dysphoria – Consent – Young person prescribed puberty blockers – Decision in Bell – Whether parents could...
Re H-N And Others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings) [2021] EWCA Civ 448
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), President, King, Holroyde LJJ, 30 March 2021)Private law children - Domestic Abuse – Fact finding – ApproachThe Court of Appeal provided guidance in four...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Violence Against Women and Girls Call for Evidence reopened
The government is seeking views to help inform the development of the next Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy. They are particularly keen to hear from people who may feel...
View all articles
Authors

The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?

Mar 2, 2021, 11:21 AM
This article attempts to explore the pronounced challenge to law and policy makers caused by the public health crisis.
Slug :
Meta Title : The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 2, 2021, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

Jake Richards, 9 Gough Chambers

This article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect the best interests of children (including children with disabilities) was unlawful. The approach and measures taken by the Ministry of Justice with regards to contact, and a failure to implement a policy and provide adequate provision to mitigate the loss of visits consistently, fairly, or at all, represents a breach of Article 8 and represents a failure to properly safeguard the best interests of children under the Children Act 2004. Further, the failures represent breaches of prohibitions on discrimination under Article 14 ECHR. 

This article attempts to explore the pronounced challenge to law and policy makers caused by the public health crisis. Whilst the challenge brought by COVID-19 is, in scope at least, unprecedented in modern times, the tools by which we can analyse the consequences remain basic principles of human rights law – the balance of fundamental rights such as the right to life (Article 2) with consideration of the discretion of the state and how it balances this positive duty with various other factors, such as the right to a family life (Article 8). In the context of prison visits, policy-makers have failed. 


The full article will be published in the February issue of Family Law

 

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 


 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from