Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

The legal recognition of lesbian-led families: justifications for change [2009] CFLQ 197

Sep 29, 2018, 17:58 PM
Title : The legal recognition of lesbian-led families: justifications for change [2009] CFLQ 197
Slug : the-legal-recognition-of-lesbian-led-families-justifications-for-change-2009-cflq-197
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 26, 2011, 09:28 AM
Article ID : 96179

This article assesses the need for and, in conclusion, justifies the integration of lesbian-led families into contemporary legal structures. Three key arguments are presented for incorporating these families within the law. The first rests on the premise that children, as individuals, are bearers of rights which the law must protect. On this basis, children have a right not to be discriminated against. The second argument relies largely on the social reality of lesbian-led families. It is argued that the proliferation of this family form demands that these children be accommodated under the umbrella of the relevant family law legislation. The final argument examines the purpose of family law and urges change on that basis. A subsidiary but essential theme running through these arguments is the relationship between children's rights and children's interests.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from