Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

The Law Relating to Affinity after B and L v UK

Sep 29, 2018, 17:05 PM
Dr Ruth Gaffney-Rhys looks at the possible justifications for the restriction on marriage between parents-in-law and children-in-law and suggests that the law does not actually achieve any of these aims
Slug : the-law-relating-to-affinity-after-b-and-l-v-uk
Meta Title : The Law Relating to Affinity after B and L v UK
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 22, 2005, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85637

Dr Ruth Gaffney-Rhys, Newport Business School, University of Wales. In September 2005 the European Court of Human Rights ruled on the legality of the various provisions of the Marriage Act 1949 (as amended by the Marriage (Prohibited Degrees of Relationship) Act 1986), which restrict the right of persons related through marriage (affinity) to marry one another in B and L v United Kingdom (Application No 36536/02) [2006] FLR (forthcoming). Dr Ruth Gaffney-Rhys looks at the possible justifications for the restriction on marriage between parents-in-law and children-in-law and suggests that the law does not actually achieve any of these aims. In the light of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights the UK Government will be required to consider reforming the law relating to prohibited degrees of relationship. The author gives examples of countries where the law on marriages based on affinity have been reformed and cites articles for readers to consider. See December [2005] Fam Law 955 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from