Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464

Sep 29, 2018, 22:54 PM
Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality
Court of Appeal allows appeal from determination that Exceptional Case Funding Scheme under LASPO 2012 is unlawful.
Slug : the-director-of-legal-aid-casework-v-is-2016-ewca-civ-464
Meta Title : The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464
Meta Keywords : Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 20, 2016, 09:29 AM
Article ID : 112337
(Court of Appeal, Laws, Briggs, Burnett LJJ, 20 May 2016)

[The judicially approved judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2016] 2 FLR 392]

Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality

Court of Appeal allows appeal from determination that Exceptional Case Funding Scheme under LASPO 2012 is unlawful.

Case No: C1/2015/2576
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 464

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT – CO/17381/2013
MR JUSTICE COLLINS

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

Date: 20/05/2016




Before:

LORD JUSTICE LAWS
LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS
and
LORD JUSTICE BURNETT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

(1) The Director of Legal Aid Casework
(2) The Lord Chancellor
Appellants

- and -

IS (a protected party, by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr M Chamberlain QC, Ms C McGahey QC and Mr M Birdling (instructed by The Treasury Solicitor) for the The Appellants
Mr R Hermer QC and Mr C Buttler (instructed by The Public Law Project) for the The Respondent

Hearing dates: 21 & 22 March 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment 
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from