Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464

Sep 29, 2018, 22:54 PM
Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality
Court of Appeal allows appeal from determination that Exceptional Case Funding Scheme under LASPO 2012 is unlawful.
Slug : the-director-of-legal-aid-casework-v-is-2016-ewca-civ-464
Meta Title : The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464
Meta Keywords : Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 20, 2016, 09:29 AM
Article ID : 112337
(Court of Appeal, Laws, Briggs, Burnett LJJ, 20 May 2016)

[The judicially approved judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2016] 2 FLR 392]

Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality

Court of Appeal allows appeal from determination that Exceptional Case Funding Scheme under LASPO 2012 is unlawful.

Case No: C1/2015/2576
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 464

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT – CO/17381/2013
MR JUSTICE COLLINS

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

Date: 20/05/2016




Before:

LORD JUSTICE LAWS
LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS
and
LORD JUSTICE BURNETT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

(1) The Director of Legal Aid Casework
(2) The Lord Chancellor
Appellants

- and -

IS (a protected party, by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr M Chamberlain QC, Ms C McGahey QC and Mr M Birdling (instructed by The Treasury Solicitor) for the The Appellants
Mr R Hermer QC and Mr C Buttler (instructed by The Public Law Project) for the The Respondent

Hearing dates: 21 & 22 March 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment 
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from