Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Will government vouchers prove a game-changer for family mediation?
Analysis of data to evaluate the government’s £500 family mediation voucher scheme is in full swing. It’s not yet complete but, as the initiative nears an end, the signs appear...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
Recently, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making misogyny a...
Guidance on allocation and gatekeeping for public children proceedings to remain in place
On 5 June 2020, the President of the Family Division made two amendments to his Guidance on Allocation and Gatekeeping for Care, Supervision and other Proceedings under Part IV of the Children...
Key challenges and the role of the family advisor in facilitating a successful succession plan
Kelly Noel-Smith, Private Client Partner, Forsters LLPRosie Schumm, Family Partner, Forsters LLPAnna Ferster, Family Associate, Forsters LLPHow best to pass on wealth to the next generation is a...
View all articles
Authors

The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464

Sep 29, 2018, 22:54 PM
Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality
Court of Appeal allows appeal from determination that Exceptional Case Funding Scheme under LASPO 2012 is unlawful.
Slug : the-director-of-legal-aid-casework-v-is-2016-ewca-civ-464
Meta Title : The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464
Meta Keywords : Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 20, 2016, 09:29 AM
Article ID : 112337
(Court of Appeal, Laws, Briggs, Burnett LJJ, 20 May 2016)

[The judicially approved judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2016] 2 FLR 392]

Costs – Legal aid – s 10, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 - Exceptional case funding scheme – Legality

Court of Appeal allows appeal from determination that Exceptional Case Funding Scheme under LASPO 2012 is unlawful.

Case No: C1/2015/2576
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 464

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT – CO/17381/2013
MR JUSTICE COLLINS

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

Date: 20/05/2016




Before:

LORD JUSTICE LAWS
LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS
and
LORD JUSTICE BURNETT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

(1) The Director of Legal Aid Casework
(2) The Lord Chancellor
Appellants

- and -

IS (a protected party, by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr M Chamberlain QC, Ms C McGahey QC and Mr M Birdling (instructed by The Treasury Solicitor) for the The Appellants
Mr R Hermer QC and Mr C Buttler (instructed by The Public Law Project) for the The Respondent

Hearing dates: 21 & 22 March 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment 
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from