Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

The Bezos Property Settlement - The Australian Way

Feb 14, 2019, 06:46 AM
Title : The Bezos Property Settlement - The Australian Way
Slug :
Meta Keywords : The Bezos Property Settlement - The Australian Way
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Feb 14, 2019, 06:00 AM
Article ID :

In this article, Rachell Davey and Cheryl Chua, of Landers & Rogers, discuss what Courts in Australia would take into account in a divorce similar to the recently announced split between Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos.

Will the (bread) winner take it all?

The short answer is: not necessarily. Even if all the assets including business interests are held in one party's name, there are other important factors such as the other party's financial and non-financial contributions to be considered in a property settlement.

The Family Law Act 1975 (the Act) sets out the factors that a Court must take into consideration when dealing with financial disputes / property settlements.

Broadly speaking, if there is no Financial Agreement between parties, the Act requires consideration of:

  1. all the assets that the parties have an interest in (jointly, separately or through entities/trusts etc);
  2. financial and non-financial contributions (which includes but is not limited to a party's role as primary home maker / carer of the children and the sacrifice of a party's own career to support the other's career);
  3. future needs of the parties; and
  4. adjustment of property to achieve a just and equitable outcome for the parties.

These considerations and other factors — such as the duration of a relationship/marriage — mean that the business interests of one party or the wealth of the bread winner can be identified as matrimonial property. This can be perceived as being "up for grabs" but really is (fairly) available for division in the circumstances of the relationship / marriage being recognised as a joint venture.

A Financial Agreement can offer various advantages depending on your unique circumstances, including:

  • certainty as to the division of assets in the event that your relationship/marriage was to breakdown or has already broken down irretrievably;
  • avoiding submission of the settlement agreement to the Court for an assessment as to whether the outcome is "just and equitable";
  • ability to outline the dispute resolution process (in the event of a disagreement); and
  • avoiding possibly lengthy and costly litigation.

It is possible to enter into a Financial Agreement before, during or after a relationship / marriage. There are, however, strict requirements that need to be met to ensure the Financial Agreement is valid and binding on the parties if or when relied upon.

Financial Agreements can be overturned by a Court, but it is also possible for a Court to exercise its powers to declare it binding.


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
  • family law
Australia-Flag-2
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Load more comments
Comment by from