Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

'The benefits of marriage in all but name'? Same-sex couples and the Civil Partnership Act 2004

Sep 29, 2018, 16:12 PM
Slug : the-benefits-of-marriage-in-all-but-name-same-sex-couples-and-the-civil-partnership-act-2004
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 5, 2007, 06:08 AM
Article ID : 84939

Nicholas Bamforth. Should marriage and civil partnerships be seen as parallel institutions for all major civil purposes? Although the Civil Partnership Act 2004 represents recognition of the importance of stable and committed same sex relationships, there is a symbolic message sent by having separate regimes for same sex and opposite sex couples. Is it acceptable to maintain marriage and civil partnerships as mutually exclusive institutions for opposite sex and same sex couples respectively under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950? This article considers the nature and legitimacy of the distinction between marriage and civil partnership, looking in detail at the provisions of the Civil Partnership Act 2004, the implications of relevant cases which have come before the European Court of Human Rights and the reasoning given in Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam), [2007] 1 FLR 296 for maintaining the distinction. Can a successful future challenge to the distinction be ruled out? Read the full article in Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol 19, No 2, 2007.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from