Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

SW & TW (Human Rights Claim: Procedure) (No.1) [2017] EWHC 450 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:46 PM
Public Law Children – Human Rights Act 1998 – Claim by children and father – Declarations and damages - Procedure
Cobb J provided guidance on the procedure to be followed in Human Rights Act 1998 claims.
Slug : sw-tw-human-rights-claim-procedure-no-1-2017-ewhc-450-fam
Meta Title : SW & TW (Human Rights Claim: Procedure) (No.1) [2017] EWHC 450 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public Law Children – Human Rights Act 1998 – Claim by children and father – Declarations and damages - Procedure
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 8, 2017, 09:52 AM
Article ID : 113944

(Family Division, Cobb J, 8 March 2017)

Public Law Children – Human Rights Act 1998 – Claim by children and father – Declarations and damages - Procedure

Cobb J provided guidance on the procedure to be followed in Human Rights Act 1998 claims.

The two children, now aged 14 and 9, had been the subjects of highly contested private law proceedings and public law proceedings when the mother made allegations of sexual abuse against the father. Contact was suspended for 2 years while an investigation including medical examinations of the children was carried out.

At no time was the father consulted about the investigation or given an opportunity to contribute.

In 2015 the mother died unexpectedly and the children initially moved to live with the maternal grandmother. Once again the father was not notified and found out from a third party. Both the father and the maternal grandmother made applications for child arrangements orders.

The local authority initiated care proceedings on the basis that the children were being harmed in the grandmother’s care due to her implacably hostile views about the father and her position of not permitting the father’s involvement in their lives.

The children were now living with the father and were thriving in his care. The local authority sought no order under Part IV of the Children Act 1989.

The Children Act proceedings were concluded with minimum judicial intervention. The parties were able to agree that the children should live with the father and that the maternal grandmother would have supervised contact as well as indirect contact.

Cobb J provided guidance on the procedure for making claims under the Human Rights Act 1998 including that such claims were governed by the CPR. Due to procedural deficiencies in relation to the children’s HRA claim the matter would have to be adjourned.

In relation to the father’s claim, the local authority had apologised and accepted that declarations should be made as to its failures in procedure. Damages were agreed of £15,000.

The children’s HRA claims were adjourned.

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 450 (Fam)

Case No: LU15C03851


Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 08/03/2017



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



- and –

(Children by their Children’s Guardian in the Children Act 1989 proceedings)

And Between

SW & TW (Children, by their yet-to-be appointed litigation friend in the Human Rights Act 1998 proceedings)



Re SW & TW (Human Rights Claim: Procedure)(No.1)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Roger McCarthy QC and Mai-Ling Savage (instructed by Local Authority Solicitor) for Luton Borough Council
Andrew Bagchi QC and Sylvester McIlwain (instructed by Edward Hayes LLP) for the Father (PW)
Barbara Connolly QC and Samantha Reddington (instructed by Northants Family Law Group) for the Maternal Grandmother (MT)
Alison Grief QC and Michael Edwards (27/28 February) John Tughan QC (2 March) (instructed by Reeds solicitors) for the Children (SW and TW)

Hearing dates: 27 & 28 February, 2 March 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment Approved


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

SW v TW (Human Rights Claim Procedure) (No 1) [2017] EWHC 450 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from