Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

SW & TW (Human Rights Claim: Procedure) (No.1) [2017] EWHC 450 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:46 PM
Public Law Children – Human Rights Act 1998 – Claim by children and father – Declarations and damages - Procedure
Cobb J provided guidance on the procedure to be followed in Human Rights Act 1998 claims.
Slug : sw-tw-human-rights-claim-procedure-no-1-2017-ewhc-450-fam
Meta Title : SW & TW (Human Rights Claim: Procedure) (No.1) [2017] EWHC 450 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public Law Children – Human Rights Act 1998 – Claim by children and father – Declarations and damages - Procedure
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 8, 2017, 09:52 AM
Article ID : 113944

(Family Division, Cobb J, 8 March 2017)

Public Law Children – Human Rights Act 1998 – Claim by children and father – Declarations and damages - Procedure

Cobb J provided guidance on the procedure to be followed in Human Rights Act 1998 claims.

The two children, now aged 14 and 9, had been the subjects of highly contested private law proceedings and public law proceedings when the mother made allegations of sexual abuse against the father. Contact was suspended for 2 years while an investigation including medical examinations of the children was carried out.

At no time was the father consulted about the investigation or given an opportunity to contribute.

In 2015 the mother died unexpectedly and the children initially moved to live with the maternal grandmother. Once again the father was not notified and found out from a third party. Both the father and the maternal grandmother made applications for child arrangements orders.

The local authority initiated care proceedings on the basis that the children were being harmed in the grandmother’s care due to her implacably hostile views about the father and her position of not permitting the father’s involvement in their lives.

The children were now living with the father and were thriving in his care. The local authority sought no order under Part IV of the Children Act 1989.

The Children Act proceedings were concluded with minimum judicial intervention. The parties were able to agree that the children should live with the father and that the maternal grandmother would have supervised contact as well as indirect contact.

Cobb J provided guidance on the procedure for making claims under the Human Rights Act 1998 including that such claims were governed by the CPR. Due to procedural deficiencies in relation to the children’s HRA claim the matter would have to be adjourned.

In relation to the father’s claim, the local authority had apologised and accepted that declarations should be made as to its failures in procedure. Damages were agreed of £15,000.

The children’s HRA claims were adjourned.


Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 450 (Fam)

Case No: LU15C03851

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 08/03/2017

Before:


THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE COBB


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Between:


LUTON BOROUGH COUNCIL
Applicant


- and –


PW
MT
SW & TW
(Children by their Children’s Guardian in the Children Act 1989 proceedings)
Respondents


And Between


PW
SW & TW (Children, by their yet-to-be appointed litigation friend in the Human Rights Act 1998 proceedings)
Claimants


-and-


LUTON BOROUGH COUNCIL
Respondent


Re SW & TW (Human Rights Claim: Procedure)(No.1)


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Roger McCarthy QC and Mai-Ling Savage (instructed by Local Authority Solicitor) for Luton Borough Council
Andrew Bagchi QC and Sylvester McIlwain (instructed by Edward Hayes LLP) for the Father (PW)
Barbara Connolly QC and Samantha Reddington (instructed by Northants Family Law Group) for the Maternal Grandmother (MT)
Alison Grief QC and Michael Edwards (27/28 February) John Tughan QC (2 March) (instructed by Reeds solicitors) for the Children (SW and TW)


Hearing dates: 27 & 28 February, 2 March 2017


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment Approved


THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE COBB


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

SW v TW (Human Rights Claim Procedure) (No 1) [2017] EWHC 450 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from