Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles

Surrogate mothers as gestational nannies?

Sep 2, 2020, 14:32 PM
This article traces the path from the moral and legal objections to commercial payments in the Warnock report to the Supreme Court's decision
Slug :
Meta Title : Surrogate mothers as gestational nannies?
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 1, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of Buckingham

In Whittington Hospital NHS Trust (Appellant) v XX ([2020] UKSC 14), Lady Hale described surrogacy law in the UK as fragmented and obscure and centred her attention on the obfuscating provisions relating to commercial payments for surrogacy arrangements. The provisions which permit the retrospective authorisation of commercial surrogacy appear to be meaningless, given that the court, faced with intended parents in whose care the child has been placed and surrogate mothers who do not wish to keep the children for themselves, can do little other than grant a parental order. Any alternative action would punish the intended parents and the child, not to mention the surrogate mother who would remain the legal mother of her surrogate baby.

This article traces the path from the moral and legal objections to commercial payments in the Warnock report to the Supreme Court's decision.  It questions whether the Court's judgment has sounded the death knell for objections to commercial surrogacy. The reality is that commercial surrogacy whether undertaken abroad or in the UK has been judicially legalised and there is an existing market for surrogacy and the employment of gestational nannies.

The full article will be published in the September issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.







Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from