Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles

Surrogate mothers as gestational nannies?

Sep 2, 2020, 14:32 PM
This article traces the path from the moral and legal objections to commercial payments in the Warnock report to the Supreme Court's decision
Slug :
Meta Title : Surrogate mothers as gestational nannies?
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 1, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of Buckingham

In Whittington Hospital NHS Trust (Appellant) v XX ([2020] UKSC 14), Lady Hale described surrogacy law in the UK as fragmented and obscure and centred her attention on the obfuscating provisions relating to commercial payments for surrogacy arrangements. The provisions which permit the retrospective authorisation of commercial surrogacy appear to be meaningless, given that the court, faced with intended parents in whose care the child has been placed and surrogate mothers who do not wish to keep the children for themselves, can do little other than grant a parental order. Any alternative action would punish the intended parents and the child, not to mention the surrogate mother who would remain the legal mother of her surrogate baby.

This article traces the path from the moral and legal objections to commercial payments in the Warnock report to the Supreme Court's decision.  It questions whether the Court's judgment has sounded the death knell for objections to commercial surrogacy. The reality is that commercial surrogacy whether undertaken abroad or in the UK has been judicially legalised and there is an existing market for surrogacy and the employment of gestational nannies.

The full article will be published in the September issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.







Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from